Gotta say, I'm not pleased with how out of hand this got. Really looks like the thread became more about trying to browbeat each other than it being about the suggestion itself.
Search found 10 matches
Search found 10 matches • Page 1 of 1
- Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:36 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Common Sense Reminder
- Replies: 7
- Views: 608
Can we just have suspicious links deleted, and the poster banned, potentially? Done and done. As a somewhat offtopic note, there's not a lot of content where using a script would even be that helpful. Frankly, if the tower fight wasn't so lucrative and consistent with a minmaxed character spamming ...
- Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:17 pm
- Forum: Balance Fu
- Topic: Beaten down, and can't get up again.
- Replies: 66
- Views: 3329
I don't think I'll delete the thread but this whole thing has been rather ridiculous and really strayed from it's original purpose. So I'd say a lock is at least called for. If you wanna try again... I guess? But frankly, if it's just retreading the same ground, maybe it's a better idea to leave the...
Thanks for once again proving me right by showing everyone that all you are is toxic garbage and have zero respect for anything other than yourself. Enjoy your forum ban. o/
Utterly ridiculous. If you're not going to genuinely acknowledge your group's wrongdoings then I guess I'll just have to, huh? Gates and stalling: You made it pretty clear to me that you were trying to stall out the people outside because they were getting in the way of your tryouts. You obviously b...
- Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:10 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Additions to the Flee Rules
- Replies: 37
- Views: 1941
The flee roll I'm referring means the out of combat one and not the flee command in battle: For out of combat fleeing, opposing d20 rolls are used for each group involved, in addition to modifiers based on the group size and the location. (Basically, it's Attacking party's d20 + [Party Size Modifier...