I was in ooc.
Someone was entering kaio-ken at the thought of someone touching their trees.
I chimed in such ramblings.
I remember link to something I saw five years ago.
Post link in ooc captioned RULE 34 TREES.
Apparently, The link itself wasn't explanatory-
As Dyst stoicly rode up on a white stalion, Dropping 259 thousand 200 second ban upon thee -
A link with the title - Rule 34 Trees somehow needed a spoiler that it was in fact Rule 34 Trees~
Sigrogana Legend 2 - Game
Posting "Sexually explicit material" in ooc. / Not warning the link was explanatory
259K seconds / 72 Hours.
I think Dyst- Sarin is my source, though.
Now, I wasn't going to post this initially. But after little persuasion, I ended up typing this two days into the ban from being told numerous times that it wasnt That explicit, And that banning for what is a very unlikely tree development- Was madness.
I would like clarification if what I posted was truly worth 3 days or not, As Ive now became skeptical of its severity, being only mildly sexual in nature. I accept the ban even if this is a somewhat petty thing to be banned for -