08-31-2016, 05:07 PM
It seems a bit redundant to shrink portrait dimensions while also adding a size limit to image uploads. Fitting images into the current dimensions is extremely painful (and already was at 275x400), and the dimensions of an image don't necessarily have to reflect file size. Even cutting the current file size limit in half while increasing the dimensions would be less painful (on both us and the server), because the almost non-existent loss of quality a site like tinypng causes is much, much preferred to the loss of quality from chopping off potentially important picture elements.
I would also like to request a method for us to invert our portrait image dimensions. With current dimensions that would mean choosing between a 235x400 box or a 400x235 box, and with restored dimensions 275x400 or 400x275. This would make it easier to use images that have more width than height, which there are many of. Your consideration is appreciated.
I would also like to request a method for us to invert our portrait image dimensions. With current dimensions that would mean choosing between a 235x400 box or a 400x235 box, and with restored dimensions 275x400 or 400x275. This would make it easier to use images that have more width than height, which there are many of. Your consideration is appreciated.