Magnetize isn't so Attractive [2.49] - Printable Version +- NEUS Projects (https://neus-projects.net/forums) +-- Forum: Sigrogana Legend 2 (OOC) (https://neus-projects.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: Bug Reports (https://neus-projects.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Thread: Magnetize isn't so Attractive [2.49] (/showthread.php?tid=8304) |
Magnetize isn't so Attractive [2.49] - InsainArcaneBirdbrain - 08-27-2021 From my testing, it seems like the magnetize status, regardless of the source, is not providing the correct -eva against the inflictor. First screenshot is with no magnetize from the front, second is with lv50 magnetize from the front. Debug log of the magnetized attack: System: Debug: Total Power for Storm Weaver / Storm Weaver was 120.5. System: Debug: Before Use Skill called. Prinny, Nerd Bun, Attack, 1 System: Debug: Attack type: /obj/skill/fe_attack. attack_nums: System: Debug: Total Power for Storm Weaver / Storm Weaver was 120.5. Nerd Bun attacks Prinny with Storm Weaver! Critical Hit! Prinny takes 198 Pierce physical damage. System: Debug: Rolling wound: /wound/open_wound/stab with a chance of 13.9% System: * Initial Damage: 139.725 Pierce Physical, flags: , sk: null, wep: Storm Weaver / /obj/items/equip/weapon/spears/abberation_spear * play_atk_anim was 1. * 0 Evade VS 243 Hit. *2 Roll(s) Remaining. This one was a hit. *1 Roll(s) Remaining. This one was a hit. * Critical check: 162 Critical VS 0 Critical Evade. (139.725) * Critical hit multi was 135. (188.629) * armor was allowed. armor_reduc was 0. (188.629) * spec_flat_reduc was 0. (188.629) * amp_multi was 1.05. (198.06) * reduc_multi was 100. (198.06); MAG DEF, 0 PHYS DEF, 100 REDUC * elem_reduc was 0. (198.06) * Damage caps applied. (198.06) * Damage shields applied. (198.06) * Final damage was: 198. Nerd Bun recovered 2 FP. Nerd Bun recovered 5 FP. Prinny takes 36 Lightning magical damage. System: Debug: Rolling wound: with a chance of 1.8% System: * Initial Damage: 35 Lightning Magic, flags: no_armor, bonus, magic, sk: null, wep: Storm Weaver / /obj/items/equip/weapon/spears/abberation_spear * play_atk_anim was . * Critical check: Defender was critical immune or crit_multi was 0. (35) * spec_flat_reduc was 0. (35) * amp_multi was 1.05. (36.75) * reduc_multi was 100. (36.75); 0 MAG DEF, PHYS DEF, 100 REDUC * elem_reduc was 0. (36.75) * Damage caps applied. (36.75) * Damage shields applied. (36.75) * Final damage was: 36. Vorpal Strike! Prinny suffers a fatal blow! Prinny takes 10498 Akashic physical damage. System: Debug: Rolling wound: with a chance of 786.9% System: * Initial Damage: 9999 Akashic Physical, flags: no_reduc, sk: null, wep: Storm Weaver / /obj/items/equip/weapon/spears/abberation_spear * play_atk_anim was . * 0 Evade VS 243 Hit. *2 Roll(s) Remaining. This one was a hit. *1 Roll(s) Remaining. This one was a hit. * Critical check: Defender was critical immune or crit_multi was 0. (9999) * spec_flat_reduc was 0. (9999) * amp_multi was 1.05. (10498.9) * elem_reduc was 0. (10498.9) * Damage caps applied. (10498.9) * Damage shields applied. (10498.9) * Final damage was: 10498. Nerd Bun recovered 1 FP. Nerd Bun recovered 5 FP. System: * basic_attack(atk:Nerd Bun,defrinny,W:Storm Weaver,dmg_mod:1,hit_mod:0,crit_mod:0,crit_dmg_mod:0,spec_flags:,auto_hit:0,dmg_scale:0,counter:0,magic_atk:0,ignore_onhit:0,dtype_rep:,retal_ok:1,auto_crit:0,fatal:1,ignore_closes:0,dmg_scale_post:,attack_num:1) * atk_multi was 115. atk_bonus was 0. dmg_scale was 0. * crit_multi was 135. crit_dmg_flat was 0. attack_num was 1. System: Debug: 0&&1 RE: Magnetize isn't so Attractive [2.49] - Senna - 08-27-2021 You sure? It looks correct so far. It gives you have the level in hit which is +25. RE: Magnetize isn't so Attractive [2.49] - InsainArcaneBirdbrain - 08-27-2021 Gah, you're right, missed the fine print in the debuff description. The thing that seems a little odd in this case is just how bad the golem magnetize really is as an inflict-check lv15 magnet that scales down on distance. That's a balance-fu more than anything though, my apologies for the mistake! |