[BluestStark]

1. GMs handled this conflict poorly, the team wanted things to be 'fair' when icly it shouldn't have been. They were a group against an entire armed force and city. They received help from mercenaries and other friends, but to claim independence from a nation and making the fight 'fair' seems a bit farfetched unless the group received help from other nations.

2. The OOC conflicts were not squashed which caused the IC conflict to go on longer than it should have. The IC conflict seemed to be over after the first day. However the OOC conflicts went on for far longer, which caused a lot of people to lose interest in even going around the Fairview area.

3. The GM team refused to ban someone who was being aggressive and has a known history of being a poor sport. I get giving someone a warning but from what I saw what they did went well beyond a warning.

4. This shows us the precedence for conflict in Korvara is going to be handled through PvP to make things 'fair' when it was originally promised to not rely on PvP. I believe that this could be fixed by some sort of conflict rules strictly for sieges or war as a whole. But that'd be something for a later date I imagine.

5. Any conflict from here on out will be terrible unless people have a great PvP build which will throw off the people that wanted to join Korvara for the RP setting. I don't know where all this stemmed from, maybe people are just tired of there being 'slow' times.

In conclusion, not only did this conflict upset many of the players involved, it also goes against what Korvara originally stood for.