Thread Rating:
  • 19 Vote(s) - 2.89 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Regarding the Ban of Lumi, Aegis, Croakie, and Mewni.
#5
I also, despite the policy, do believe this doesn't really clarify anything, at all. It casts the exact same wide blankets the unnamed bans do, only loosely getting into potentials in the harassment sections of what could have happened, and I can presumably imagine that not every point applies to every person in the situation, too. There's a lot here that just feels nebulous, uncertain - and there's just no reason here beyond the roles themselves to trust that this is really the right call.

I understand that this means nothing - not feeling any more reassured isn't going to change anyone's mind, no less the GMs themselves, but this vague communication, followed by "we hope you can self-reflect and come to an understanding", helps no-one, because I don't think this is going to miraculously jog any memories to reflect from. It comes across more condescending than any attempt to actually mediate the situation.

This is not a good attempt to clear the air.
[Image: 400px-Nihilus%2C_the_Abyssal_Flame.gif]
Ending 145: Disappointed in Humanity
[-] The following 13 users Like WaifuApple's post:
  • Aegis, Anhita, Asellia, DancesWithMoths, Deathly, Dezark, HaTeD, Illumi, Mewni, noblekame, Shadbase, Snake, Toffee


Messages In This Thread
RE: Regarding the Ban of Lumi, Aegis, Croakie, and Mewni. - by WaifuApple - 03-03-2023, 02:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Sigrogana Legend 2 Discord