06-02-2018, 10:22 PM
More often than not, Invocations are met with silence instead of damage, due to the talent that prevents them from being broken with damage.
That said, I think that bluff could see far more use in tricking your opponent if the following were to occur:
When using Snatch Spell, the spellthief will draw in any spells and negate/take them, furthermore, if bluff is being used, the spellthief will negate any incoming silences, and gain immunity to silence for 2 rounds if they were to negate a silence.
Any thoughts? I would like to see Spellthief becoming more of a trickster class, its starting to get there, but Bluff could really use a touch up to make sure its worth it to actually bluff an invocation and not hard-cast it all the time.
That said, I think that bluff could see far more use in tricking your opponent if the following were to occur:
When using Snatch Spell, the spellthief will draw in any spells and negate/take them, furthermore, if bluff is being used, the spellthief will negate any incoming silences, and gain immunity to silence for 2 rounds if they were to negate a silence.
Any thoughts? I would like to see Spellthief becoming more of a trickster class, its starting to get there, but Bluff could really use a touch up to make sure its worth it to actually bluff an invocation and not hard-cast it all the time.