[Chaos]

If you both agree to something like this and have proof, and they decide to not honor the agreement, you can feel free to tell a GM and let them help resolve the situation. Also, GMs have the ability to kill off your character provided you are given fair warning and have the option to steer clear of it. For example, if you get arrested a lot for violent crimes, you will probably be told that the next time you get arrested for it, you will likely be executed.

The issue raised in this topic, I believe, is that the 'no forcing death' rule, as its currently written, does not properly convey the 'you are forbidden from exploiting this' part. I don't think it's necessary, but the players keep saying otherwise.

If we were to tack an addition onto the rule, such as,

On the other hand, you are expected to honor agreements or situations that you intentionally accepted. While we encourage discussion if something happens, trying to use this rule to cheat your way out of consequences is not allowed.

This would curb the potential for people to 'misread' the rule.