Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sanctity Resistances
#7
(01-06-2024, 07:55 PM)Trexmaster Wrote: SAN is in a weird spot. Its primary purpose is to enable racial benefits that scale off it, but some have far more desirable effects than others, thus making SAN a more worthwhile investment.

Races without any such things to get from building SAN often don't (invest into it), this change would only make it so the races that already want to build mid to high levels of SAN get even more out of their investment.

We already have the issue of status res being so polarizing due to this as it's often not worth buying solely for the status res if your race gets nothing out of the SAN, or so little it's not worth bothering.

San doesn't need to be any more important than it already is in the current state of the game.

This is very fair, and I suppose I should've started outright with a racials balance post. Some are so minimal for so great a benefit (Glykin 20 investment, for example) and others are just... meh. Not all racials are created equally for certain. It just sucks to have a stat and its offshoots (especially status res) gated behind something that has to be balanced towards stuff that not everyone can use.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sanctity Resistances - by MothEnthusiast - 01-06-2024, 05:59 PM
RE: Sanctity Resistances - by Ray2064 - 01-06-2024, 06:40 PM
RE: Sanctity Resistances - by Autumn - 01-06-2024, 07:15 PM
RE: Sanctity Resistances - by MothEnthusiast - 01-06-2024, 07:20 PM
RE: Sanctity Resistances - by caliaca - 01-06-2024, 07:41 PM
RE: Sanctity Resistances - by Trexmaster - 01-06-2024, 07:55 PM
RE: Sanctity Resistances - by MothEnthusiast - 01-06-2024, 08:18 PM
RE: Sanctity Resistances - by Snake - 01-07-2024, 11:28 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Sigrogana Legend 2 Discord