Poll: Glykins should pay the san tax
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
PAY THE STAT TAX LIKE EVERYONE ELSE
71.43%
20 71.43%
I don't want to pay the tax because I have a Glykin
28.57%
8 28.57%
Total 28 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Glykins - Making them invest in San for their best racial
#21
idk, I think if you get poisoned or another sort of debuff like that where you use an ability or item to cleanse it you shouldn't be able to be poisoned again the next turn at the very least, it encourages some kite-worthy gameplay, and that tied in with say, going something that heals can be annoying just as an on paper thing.

however, back onto topic.
i think while ic should be a valid thing for races, with game design you need to know when to do it and when not to do it, the very typical example of this is say, call of duty.
you can carry 8 grenades in real life, you can't in call of duty.
you need to know when and where to pull back on the 'this is realistic' and 'this is a game'.
do I think that something should have full immunity to poison? sure, if it has proper downsides or setup, because tbh I think summoners being able to rotate immunities is not healthy or engaging, but I'm not too sure on the entire balance of SL2, just giving my take as somebody that has (attempted) to study game design.
#nerf summoner
#nerf poison
[-] The following 1 user Likes BoberJones's post:
  • HaTeD
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Glykins - Making them invest in San for their best racial - by BoberJones - 07-15-2022, 06:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Sigrogana Legend 2 Discord