10-21-2022, 03:43 AM
I agree fully with Anhita, and as someone who took part, it feels incredibly silly.
I'd likely be much, much harsher against GMs so I'm glad someone else posted instead.
This sets an incredibly bad precedent, and frankly makes me wonder what the point of conflict is supposed to even be if you can get out of consequences so easily.
Many people had their time effectively wasted due to multiple days stuck waiting, unable to actually do what we were supposed to, let alone effectively having ICs paused.
And then we're stuck with a decision forced upon us.
The ones who effectively started a war while vastly outnumbered and outgunned were not punished.
The ones who arrived in response, the stronger force no less, were the ones who were punished, unable to fulfill the primary intent of the siege, and then left to figure out how to make the IC fit.
I guess our IC is at the whims of the GM team now, consequences aren't real unless they say so. Great message for an 'RP-mandatory game.'
I'd likely be much, much harsher against GMs so I'm glad someone else posted instead.
This sets an incredibly bad precedent, and frankly makes me wonder what the point of conflict is supposed to even be if you can get out of consequences so easily.
Many people had their time effectively wasted due to multiple days stuck waiting, unable to actually do what we were supposed to, let alone effectively having ICs paused.
And then we're stuck with a decision forced upon us.
The ones who effectively started a war while vastly outnumbered and outgunned were not punished.
The ones who arrived in response, the stronger force no less, were the ones who were punished, unable to fulfill the primary intent of the siege, and then left to figure out how to make the IC fit.
I guess our IC is at the whims of the GM team now, consequences aren't real unless they say so. Great message for an 'RP-mandatory game.'
![[-]](https://neus-projects.net/forums/images/collapse.png)
