[Hanzo]

If you want to be a Duelist x Something and relies on on-hit [Why majority gets it anyway, because of Fleur].
Also, about 'RP aspect' Dev already said that classes does not define how you RP or play said class, so no, there is no right way to play ghost, because you can flavor it however you'd like, seeing someone go "Oh! a fellow black knight!" to someone is the cringiest thing possible.

Again, pure flavouring is not what I was talking about. There are things that you can't flavor, such as Void Poisoning, or the self-harm part of Ghost's kit. It just is there.

My main point is, when it comes to locking down classes, so they could no longer be swapped at leisure, is that it would have not an ounce of sense, looking from an RP perspective. People go from being a Verglas, or a beefy monk, to a master archer by simply going: "Yeh, I found this cool bow, and was thinking about changing my style." N.O.

That is far more cringy than the above. Why? Because the one being mistaken could take that as a compliment, and inform the person that they are not, in fact, a black knight. There is a way to explain such a thing via RP. You can NOT explain, how you gained a great degree of mastery over a style/class, in a single day. That would be the same, if Hanzo LEd, picked up a Tome, speced into a priest, and managed to stand toe to toe with the likes of, say, Mavis - despite only until recently, thinking that the only use for Mercana was torture. NO, no NO!

If there is, of course, a way that would make a change possible, it should be submitted to GMs for review. Re-using a character, logs, and A LOT OF THEM, describing learning the actual style, from a master perhaps? This, along with the struggle of adopting alien techniques, if they so are - all written in a believable way.