I agree with most of the sentiments in this thread, generally speaking, but I also have a preemptive suggestion to make:
If Tactician is changed to be a more viable sub-class, then it's going to be incredibly splashable (pun not intended). With that in mind, I could suggest an addendum to the way your performance rating is determined. You only have one chef in the kitchen, only one chief of police, and only one guy calling the shots on the battlefield; therefore, add a clause that says something like -1 tactics rank for every additional ally who is a Tactician, to a minimum of +0 tactics rank increase.
This way you have one true tactician on the team, rather than four people who all picked it up just because it's become more useful as a sub-class.
If Tactician is changed to be a more viable sub-class, then it's going to be incredibly splashable (pun not intended). With that in mind, I could suggest an addendum to the way your performance rating is determined. You only have one chef in the kitchen, only one chief of police, and only one guy calling the shots on the battlefield; therefore, add a clause that says something like -1 tactics rank for every additional ally who is a Tactician, to a minimum of +0 tactics rank increase.
This way you have one true tactician on the team, rather than four people who all picked it up just because it's become more useful as a sub-class.
![[-]](https://neus-projects.net/forums/images/collapse.png)
