[renowner]

I'm pretty against this wholeheartedly, sapping people's momentum by resisting something seems fair to me. Lots of people already attack in ways you can't resist anyway. It sounds more like you have an issue with drowned woman more than anything, or an issue of it not being fun not being able to hit someone three or four times a turn with your fleur crits. . .Which is valid ,but like. . .If they specifically are building to stop you from getting to hit them three or four times that should bea thing they can do. And its a lot easier to get huge critical percentages than it is to get huge critical resistance percentages.

Drowned woman was never an issue before holy got absolutely gutted. Just having her in your pocket caused you to eat fat holy damage multipliers, which was an actaully fair balance. Now holy sucks so having her is free, and all you get in return for her install is a dark weakness that's mitigated by having a carbuncle exist in your pocket.

I'm also just going to use this space to say that I think dark bards negating 15% of your resistances is insane, especially when sound already has basically no way whatsoever to be resisted outside of using a really shitty set or specifically being a heron.

TLDR: Make holy good again and make drowned woman an actual choice.
I think resists sapping momentum is fine.
Lots of dagger and fleur people use acid weapons and stuff anyway - if you're specifically building to be good against something then you should be good against it, and losing one momentum per attack really only messes up fleur crit people anyway, otherwise all it generally amounts to is not letting them guard or use a magic stone that turn.
Its also how you stop bosses from hitting you twice in pve, which would suck to lose.