Posts: 4,150
Threads: 948
Likes Received: 1,340 in 524 posts
Likes Given: 466
Joined: Feb 2015
Skills with cinder tiles that do not currently that do not scale from Fire ATK atm:
Soldier:
Retreating Swipe
Roundtrip
Execute
Black Knight:
Bright Bishop
Crescent Rook
Demon Hunter:
Chaser
Crashing Bull
Bellowing Stag
Duelist:
Cyclone Spear
Sidecut
Sillcut
Kensei:
Toiken
Hirazuki
Kagekiri
Archer:
Aerial Razor
Unless these aren't bugs then ignore me.
•
Posts: 4,553
Threads: 730
Likes Received: 890 in 467 posts
Likes Given: 1,353
Joined: Sep 2015
Martial Artist:
-Peddling Wheel
-Heaven Kick
Bonder:
-Infernal Summon
-Aliagmato
Don't forget.
(Also, yeah, stamp [Denied] and ignore it if it's intended.)
•
Posts: 4,150
Threads: 948
Likes Received: 1,340 in 524 posts
Likes Given: 466
Joined: Feb 2015
"Snake" Wrote:Martial Artist:
-Peddling Wheel
-Heaven Kick
Peddling Wheel and Heaven kick are scaling properly.
The others are true though.
•
Posts: 7,132
Threads: 391
Likes Received: 512 in 227 posts
Likes Given: 10
Joined: Nov 2014
•
Posts: 4,150
Threads: 948
Likes Received: 1,340 in 524 posts
Likes Given: 466
Joined: Feb 2015
I suppose they aren't, I presumed so since Shinken and the others were changed recently, though to be fair, 50% of these skills do 0 damage on cinder tiles.
•
Posts: 4,553
Threads: 730
Likes Received: 890 in 467 posts
Likes Given: 1,353
Joined: Sep 2015
Since this is a balance fu thread now, yeah, I think this is fair to receive the same changes of Shinken and Crystal Rose. Why? Those little guys' Fire Physical Damage and Matador. It's pretty sad to still see 0-5 damage when the defenses are in % reduction.
But that's really something I'd vote for 50% Fire ATK instead of 100% Fire ATK for the skills that doesn't use a Sword, just to give those a fair use.
•
Posts: 1,428
Threads: 227
Likes Received: 1 in 1 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2014
If the Cinder tiles doing 0 most of the time on those skills is intended, can we at least get it changed to an effect that isn't literally useless at best and detrimental at worst?
*loud burp*
•
Posts: 7,132
Threads: 391
Likes Received: 512 in 227 posts
Likes Given: 10
Joined: Nov 2014
My main concern is just not wanting to make cinders ultra powerful again. They were ridiculously strong for a long time. That said, I don't want them to be doing 0 damage to all targets, either.
•
Posts: 4,150
Threads: 948
Likes Received: 1,340 in 524 posts
Likes Given: 466
Joined: Feb 2015
I think cinders honestly are a little strong right now when used with 100% fire attack, if we normalized them all(including shinken and crystal rose) to 25% fire attack, then I think that would be a worthwhile reason to build fire attack, as well as make them fair to play against.
•
Posts: 4,553
Threads: 730
Likes Received: 890 in 467 posts
Likes Given: 1,353
Joined: Sep 2015
Why not 75% for all, then? (That means cinders doing maximum of 45-55 fire physical damage. Quack. 25% would be 17 physical fire damage, enough to make Matador and anti-cinders enchant turn the damage into a flat 0. Spooks pls.)
Max Fire ATK you can get is 70 with all the talent extras, two weapons and a capped STR. (approximately.) And honestly Cinders are not that much of a big matter when we have a foot enchant that halves their damage, fire resist/absorb and spiked threads to prevent knockbacks into Cinders.
•