[WaifuApple]

My questions are regarding transparency. Ultimately, the announcement made only covers the fact that doxxing cases will be looked at retroactively and handled accordingly. But in general there have been other mentions of extreme cases that will have simply gotten lost in the winding passage of a really, really busy chat.

Does the GM team have any intention of a supplementary message open to let people know that this also applicable to other extreme offenses from the past? Something that's easily seen and not locked behind a lot of scrolling, word of mouth, and a search function (which would require knowing about it anyway). Can some examples be provided of what the GM considered a hypothetical extreme offense so people are able to easily understand what isn't and isn't going to be dug up, placed officially and at the forefront, so that restless concerns about the past can be put away, while also giving people who might have a case and not realise it the push they need to realise 'hey, maybe I should revisit this'? Because ultimately outside of the very obvious doxxing, and the vaguely mentioned financial exploitation, I am super unsure of just what the running definition for this is going to be.

Will this come to the site with the rules on it, and be enshrined? Because I'll be honest, we've had awkward run-ins with hidden rules before, and it's my full belief that official things like this SHOULD make it onto that site. It really sucks when you look at the rules and don't realise you're still missing information.